Pengaruh Penggunaan Chat GPT (Generative Pre-Trained Transformer) terhadap Rata-Rata Nilai IPK Mahasiswa Sekolah Tinggi Agama Buddha (STAB) Kertarajasa
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare the effects on students at Kertarajasa College of Buddhism (STAB) before and after they used Chat GPT. The research design employed in this study is an experiment using a quantitative methodology. A questionnaire given to every student and the average GPA from batch 21's first and seventh semesters served as the research instrument. A Likert scale and a t-test will be used to assess the data gathered from the distribution of questionnaires in order to determine the average GPA score. The study's findings clarify why Chat GPT's degree of use has a positive impact. The evaluation, comprising 30 questions, yielded a total score of 5710 with a percentage achievement of 73.21%. In the partial assessment, the motivation aspect had a value of 1909 with a percentage achievement of 73.35%, the effectiveness aspect had a value of 1889 with a percentage achievement of 72.65%, and the technology aspect had a value of 1912 with a percentage achievement of 73.54%. Additionally, the average GPA value in the t-test showed a significance value of 2.61> t_0.05, indicating a very real effect of Chat GPT use on raising the average GPA value. As a result, measures must be taken to guarantee that this technology is exclusively utilized as a tool to help educators deliver better instruction.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Amodei, Dario, Chris Olah, Jacob Steinhardt, Paul Christiano, John Schulman, dan Dan Mané. (2016) "Concrete problems in AI safety." arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06565.
Anjani Nabila Sigit. (2018). Pengaruh Prestasi Belajar, Masa Studi, Dan Keaktifan Berorganisasi Terhadap Masa Tunggu Dan Relevansi Pekerjaan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ekonomi, 7(6), 554–565.
Arthur, W. B. (2009). The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves. New York: Free Press.
Baskara, F. R. (2024). The Promises and Pitfalls of Using Chat GPT for Self-Determined Learning in Higher Education: An Argumentative Review. Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia. DOI: 10.47435/sentikjar.v2i0.1825.
Brundage, Miles, Shahar Avin, Jack Clark, Helen Toner, Peter Eckersley, Ben Garfinkel, Allan Dafoe, Paul Scharre, Thomas Zeitzoff, Bobby Filar, Owain Evans, Michael Page, Joanna Bryson, Roman Yampolskiy, dan Dario Amodei. (2018). "The malicious use of artificial intelligence: Forecasting, prevention, and mitigation." arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.07228.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
Drucker, P. F. (1967). The Effective Executive. New York: Harper & Row.
Faiz, A., & Kurniawaty, I. (2023). Tantangan Penggunaan ChatGPT dalam Pendidikan Ditinjau dari Sudut Pandang Moral. EDUKATIF : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 5(1), 456–463. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v5i1.4779
Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2018). Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Gordijn, B., & Have, H. A. (2023). ChatGPT: evolution or revolution Med. Health Care Philos. 26, 1–2. doi: 10.1007/s11019-023-10136-0
Goetsch, D. L., & Davis, S. B. (2014). Quality Management for Organizational Excellence: Introduction to Total Quality (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.
Hanum Siregar, F., Hasmayni, B., Lubis, A. H. (2023). The Analysis of Chat GPT Usage Impact on Learning Motivation among Scout Students. International Journal of Research and Review, 10(7), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230774
Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the Nature of Man. Cleveland: World Publishing Company.
Ishikawa Kaoru. (1985). What is Total Quality Control The Japanese Way. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Jonassen, D. H., Land, S. M. (2012). Theoretical foundations of learning environments (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Kadarisman Darwin, Muhandri Tjahja (2016). Pengendalian Mutu pada Industri Pangan. Tangerang Selatan: Universitas Terbuka
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Kitamura, F. C. (2023). ChatGPT Is Shaping the future of medical writing but still requires human judgment. Radiology 230171. doi: 10.1148/radiol.230171
Komarulzaman, M., Yang, P., Baik, L., Arifdarma, I., Sos, S., Besar, B., … Pertanian, K. (2023). Pengaruh teknologi CHAT GPT terhadap dunia pendidikan : potensi dan tantangan. Jurnal AgriWidya, 4(1), 56–66.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.
McMillan, K. J. (2019). Critical Literacy in A Digital Era: Technology, Rhetoric, and The Public Interest. Routledge.
Moelong, Lexy J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Ramaja Rosdakarya.
Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Educational Assessment of Students (7th ed.). Pearson.
Russell, Stuart J., Daniel Dewey, dan Max Tegmark. (2017)."Artificial intelligence and society: A new agenda." Nature 541.7636: 518-522.
Rohaendi, S., & Laelasari, N. I. (2020). Penerapan Teori Piaget dan Vygotsky Ruang Lingkup Bilangan dan Aljabar pada Siswa Mts Plus Karangwangi. PRISMA, 9(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v9i1.886
Sari, Y. A., & Rafsanjani, M. A. (2020). Pengaruh Pendapatan Orang Tua dan Minat Berorganisasi Terhadap IPk Mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Ekonomi. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi (JUPE), 8(3), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.26740/jupe.v8n3.p122-130
Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Shoufan, A. (2023). Exploring Students’ Perceptions of CHATGPT: Thematic Analysis and Follow-Up Survey. IEEE Access.
Snelbecker, G.E. (2015). Understanding Scientific Theories: An Advanced Text for Science Students. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suoth, L., Mutji, E. J., & Balamu, R. (2022). Penerapan Pendekatan Konstruktivisme Vygotsky Terhadap Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 5(1), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v5i1.40510
Suharmawan, Wahid. (2023). Pemanfaatan Chat GPT Dalam Dunia Pendidikan. Education Journal : Journal Educational Research and Development, 7(2), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.31537/ej.v7i2.1248
Wibowo, T. U. S. H., Akbar, F., Ilham, S. R., & Fauzan, M. S. (2023). Tantangan dan Peluang Penggunaan Aplikasi Chat GPT Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Sejarah Berbasis Dimensi 5.0. JURNAL PETISI (Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi), 4(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.36232/jurnalpetisi.v4i2.4226
Yu H. (2023). Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. Front. Psychol. 14:1181712. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.11817122